
They talk a fine talk (albeit one that has its roots in - yawn - 'classic' contemporary criticism). They walk a fine walk (articles on the 'death' of the small town gig poster and why Grazia is better than the NME).
Here is part of their manifesto (and it's GREAT to have a manifesto):
We do not believe in a linear history of rock and pop music, or the idea of progress followed by decline. The best music has not been made already. There was no ‘golden age’ of music to mourn. Art reflects its time, and survives or fails to have relevance for reasons that change with time. The tag of ‘post modern’ allows today’s music media off the hook too easily. A blind alley if ever there was one, ‘post modern’ is used in the main to merely justify an approach to music and culture by which music criticism acts as a consumer guide rather than actually telling you anything about music. The music media have become a corporate media for a corporate age. The increasingly small number of dominant music companies are bigger and further removed from their audience than at any time since the dawn of recording but in greater control of the tools of audience persuasion than ever. In the same way car manufacturers divide the market into different target audiences so do music magazines and radio stations. From 'oldies' magazines Uncut and Mojo and Classic Rock, which serve up hoary tales of bands and drugs/girls/outrageous behaviour in what amounts to this generation’s equivalent of war memoirs, to young trendies such as NME. Ditto TV, radio, you name it, markets, markets, markets. A cynical approach to music produces cynical thinking on music. Irony tells us nothing about the band but everything about the critic.
(It goes on much longer than this, and I agree with most of what they're saying.)
But... Bangs alive! Their musical taste...!
Peter Gabriel: Peter Gabriel 3 (1980), The High Llamas: Gideon Gaye (1994), The Week That Was: The Week That Was (2008) The Associates: Sulk (1982), My Bloody Valentine: Loveless (1991), TV On The Radio: Return To Cookie Mountain (2006) PIL: Flowers of Romance (1981), John Adams: A Short Ride In A Fast Machine (1986), Four Tet: Rounds (2003) Sonic Youth: Daydream Nation (1988), Smashing Pumpkins: Mellon Collie and the Infinite Sadness (1995), Mars Volta: Bedlam in Goliath (2007) Steve Reich: Music for 18 Musicians (1978), Primal Scream: Screamadelica (1991), Animal Collective: Merriweather Post Pavilion (2009), Cut Copy In Ghost Colours (2008), D'Angelo Voodoo (2000), Phoenix Wolfgang Amadeus Phoenix (2009) Scritti Politti: Songs To Remember (1982), Penguin Cafe Orchestra: Signs of Life (1987), The Boo Radleys: Giant Steps (1993), Aphex Twin: Drugks (2001), Deerhoof: Friend Opportunity (2007), British Sea Power: Do You Like Rock Music? (2008), Radiohead: In Rainbows (2007), Bill Evans: The Bill Evans Album (1971). Alicia Keys: As I Am (2007), The Smiths: The Smiths (1984), r.e.m: Accelerate (2008)
Make no mistake.
These people are the enemy.

Ew. The typical tastes of men in their forties who think they're being eclectic and embracing of popular culture but really they just buy The Word and watch Jools Holland. Strangely enough not many women in that list either (or, probably, in their lives.
ReplyDeleteno sleater-kinney? oh dear.
ReplyDeletecan't really bring myself to disagree with this, though: http://www.modernmusicreview.com/mmr_nme_grazia.htm
ReplyDeleteHaven't you just played into their hands by Reading and more so commenting on it.
ReplyDeleteRelax!
I looked at the front page, yawned loudly and clicked 'close tab'.
ReplyDeleteI can't relax. Not when the enemy is out there, masquerading as 'people who care'
ReplyDeleteET, what music blogs are good? what do you recommend? now that plan b has gone, i need something to take its place.
ReplyDeleteWell...you could do worse than have a trawl through the ones listed in my Blogroll. They wouldn't be there if I didn't think they had some merit.
ReplyDeleteNow I might have got this wrong but isn't journalism supposed to be about more than cutting and pasting from someone else's website? Also what's wrong with - yawn - classic contemporary criticism? Good criticism/journalism isn't necessarily about gun shots and explosions - insinuating that critical writing is boring is a bit like saying you prefer TV to reading because you don't have to work so hard to understand them. Both have their place for different reasons. You might then say that we all listen to music because poems are also a bit difficult? I'm sure nobody here would agree with that notion - they both serve different functions. Diversity is a good thing, idiots. Go and appreciate The Specials.
ReplyDeleteI have to agree with Mark. Whilst modernmusicreview.com may have some slightly protentious (if not justified) views, it does serve as an excellent outlet of realism and an engine for thought provocation. After all, if our views on music, life and any other topic were never challenged, surely we would never take the time to discover exactly what our views are? Thus leaving us in a very weak state of sheep-like obedience to whatever the media/charts tells us we should be listening to.
ReplyDeleteA world without opinion would be a very dull place indeed.
I'd like "Modern" Music Review a whole lot more if I actually believed for one second that they really did love (not "appreciate", for fuck's sake!!!) The Specials.
ReplyDeleteOh wow thanks for the photo of Alicia Keys Everett, she's gorgeous isn't she?
ReplyDeleteI don't get ET's qualification regarding the Specials. The idea that everyone has to be equally passionate about everything you are passionate about to be worthy of esteem seems a bit emotionally, and critically, retarded. It's perfectly possible to 'love' something and not appreciate it, and vice versa.
ReplyDeleteThe original ET post is disappointingly vague and makes a number of cultural assumptions that lose me - which people, the writers linked to or the ones in the list? Enemy of what or whom? For why?
Different Mark to the other Specials poster
[...] recorded that godawful James Bond theme with Alicia Keys – surely, a travesty of a theme to match even Duran Duran’s – in preference to [...]
ReplyDeleteMr Everett, it’s been a while but it's been tricky. How to do justice to your criticisms, how to reply to your good self in the manner you deserve?
ReplyDelete1. Say **** *** or ********* *** or ***** **** *** and **** dog? Not funny.
2. Come up with the idea of Truisms - a ‘joke’ compendium of fake albums posted on modernmusicreview.com? Even less funny.
3. A ‘thank you’ for the flattery hidden within the statement “these people are the enemy”? We welcome your description, we are proud to be the enemy - but no, there will be no 'thank yous.'
4. An explanation of how and why our maligned ‘Different Road to Inspiration’ album list evolved on modernmusicreview.com and will continue to evolve. We need give no explanations.
5. A desperate plea that we quite like The Specials, especially More Specials and In The Studio with. . . though the sight of grey-haired paunches leaping up and down to Gangsters fills us with as little pleasure as seeing Bad Manners still performing Lip Up Fatty? No. This isn’t the school playground.
6. Perhaps, Mr True, the only response fitting to a former Legend now that Plan B has gone ‘bye bye’, sadly, is to advise you to stop fading away. Find fresh legs, put your talents to better use - free yourself from the mulch of trivia, do something younger, more radical, write something you truly care about, write for us. Go on, we dare you.
felicitations
Graham Chalmers
www.modernmusicreview.com
P.S. wrong Specials albums to like... !!
ReplyDeleteHey Graham
ReplyDeleteThat's the first entry I've read from your camp that is almost halfway entertaining. Keep it up, and I might well have to start eating my words... not a problem, because they're so damn tasty.
I might yet take you up on that offer.
e
modernmusicreview.com watches our words. We do not engage in an hourly stream of trivia. We turn like a ship.
ReplyDeleteFirstly, there is nothing to be gained from some lame, old-timers’ debate about the respective merits of The Specials’ first two albums, even if it was produced by Elvis Costello.
Secondly, if you are serious, truly prolific Mr True, about taking us up on our writing offer that is, here is your mission - and we think you should choose to accept it.
Somehow, in the competitive cesspit of British criticism, the idea of being influenced by anyone remotely well-known is taken as a sign of laziness on the part of the influencee.
Norman Mailer! Hunter S Thompson! Tom Wolfe! Joan Didion! Lester Bangs!
modernmusicreview.com shares no such embarrassment.
The key thing with those writers, as well as their talent, was they put themselves where the action was -until drugs, fame or old age got in the way.
The question we invite you to consider and act on is the following:
Where is the action today in British music? Dare you put yourself there and write the truth about it 100% per cent? Can you remove your hat of irony for a minute or is it super-glued to your head like Charlie Brooker? Not that Charlie Brooker is super-glued to your head.
Should you wish to take up this assignment, and we think you should, take us long as you want to write it.
If you wish to take up a different assignment of your own choosing, again, take as long as you want.
Stop spreading you talents thin. Refrain from trying to grab at everything as it flies through the air, it can’t all be worth catching.
All hail the arrival of the Slow Movement in music criticism.
www.modernmusicreview.com