Sunday, October 25, 2009

Happy 'Quit MySpace' Day



This is a great article about an incredibly unrealised music platform site run by possibly the biggest bunch of idiots on the Internet.

MySpace clearly don’t get it.
They think that they’re still in the social network game. That they are somehow competing with Facebook. They’re not. That’s not the business they’re in. I mean really - do you know ANYONE who uses MySpace for day to day general social networking? They may have been pioneers in this field (I don’t happen to think they were… but they MAY have been) - but that’s not what people use them for now.
Don’t get me wrong: You CAN manage your day to day independent music career using MySpace. Many people do. But it’s like drying your hair with a toaster. Possible, but not really fit for purpose.
Let’s be clear. We decided what MySpace would become. They set up a social networking platform, but what we as users decided to use it for is as a musicplatform. Were it not for issues of timing and some core functionality that nobody else was offering right up front, it would probably have been dead by now, because they still haven’t realised that very simple fact.
The only thing keeping MySpace on life support to this day, as far as traffic is concerned - is YOUR music. For reasons of critical mass alone, more or less every artist on earth has a presence there - and that’s mostly because every other artist on earth does.
And we put up with its broken interface, bad design, 90s technology, ad-riddled BS, and complete lack of comprehension about what MySpace is really for - for one reason alone: nobody else has EVERY FRICKIN’ BAND ON THE PLANET.
Right now, nobody else can do what MySpace could do, should they choose to. Nobody else has everyone in music signed up, and it seems unlikely at this point that anyone else ever will again. Lots of stuff does things far better than MySpace - but everyone’s already AT MySpace. Inertia rules.
Read on.

3 comments:

  1. I just wrote my own anti-MySpace rant on my MySpace blog a couple days ago. IMO MySpace's main advantage nowadays are 1. google-juice 2. everyone kinda knows how it works 3. everyone knows and expects that every band has some sort of MySpace presence.

    In my experience, MySpace can be good for networking with other bands; and for booking, and announcing shows. Other than that, I think its use to musicians is limited. The fact that you *still* can't export or syndicate content from MySpace is utterly ridiculous... not to mention the weird and inconsistent behavior of the MySpace morality police.. & OH YEAH and there's their partners "SnoCap"-- (google "sno cap ripped me off" or check your own snocap balance...) ...In summary, MySpace IS owned and operated by Satan's minons and BEWARE.

    I'm lately more intrigued by sites like LastFM, which use the power of the wiki, which DO allow content to be beautifully syndicated into other websites, which offer a better representation of the artists' catalog, are which respond far FAR more positively to cries for help...

    AND.. they'll connect your music with other similar types, stream it, add "buy" buttons, AND PAY ROYALTIES. Yeah, that's right. Royalties.

    ReplyDelete
  2. (from Facebook)

    Bill Cummings
    I totally agree I think they've missed the boat for years in terms of useability, functionality and plain giving artists a proper platform to promote themselves and their music. Plus it looks hideously stripped back. Look at the rise of facebook and twitter they proove that Myspace wasn't fulfilling every need in terms of interaction. If facebook could sort out some kind of decent streaming it could soon superceed myspace for music...

    Even Last.fm is a far more interesting/useable website for the artist and fan, if that could be turned into a spotify like appilication that sits on your desktop now that would be interesting, you'd have major label/indie/and unsigned bands on your desktop to search through, although Spotify by recently opening up their catalogue to small bands have.
    Yesterday at 11:29 · Delete

    Bill Cummings
    already dipped their toe into this area...
    Yesterday at 11:29 · Delete

    Celine Barley Lux
    A very long way to say that, in a nutshell, myspace is on its way to be defunct. I cancelled my own account 3 years ago after being bombarded by "friend requests" from John, Paul and Peter all trying to sell me their uninteresting crap. A social network it isn't. Mind you I don't think highly of Facebook either but that's the only one that works for me right now. God forbid I'd use Bebo! *shivers*
    Yesterday at 12:22 · Delete

    ReplyDelete
  3. (from Facebook)

    Paul Louis Archer
    You might believe that MS has a broken interface, bad design, 90s technology, ad-riddled BS, and complete lack of comprehension. However, it's better than Facebook by miles.
    27 October at 23:30 · Delete

    Jules Toogood
    I agree with ET. It is a handy tool to find and hear / see bands you have heard of - they are always there! As a non-pro musician, it is great for me. I can write a tune today, record it today (however lo-fi) and upload it that day. As soon as I post the link (perhaps on here), anyone can hear it.
    Simple genius.
    ...but not social networking.
    Bravo inertia!
    27 October at 23:47 · Delete

    Paul Louis Archer
    I've always believed that Facebook is for the unsavvy IT illiterate crowd, while Myspace requires a modicum of intelligence. Myspace is not incomprehensible in the slightest. Not everything is music related in this world. MS is also a very good platform for photography and the visual arts. Facebook might be more popular by far, but I concentrate on quality over quantity. I disagree with ET.
    28 October at 00:34 · Delete

    Jules Toogood
    ....and you have every right to.
    28 October at 01:18 · Delete

    Jimmy Dee
    Is true True..is the austin allegro of the interweb.
    28 October at 01:27 · Delete

    ReplyDelete